Moving, inspiring and touch our human spirits
Thanks Christina for the tip

Are our children’s childhood experiences being stolen by making them into a miniature adults? This is not something new. We’ve seen old paintings from the Victorian era where children also dress up as a miniature adults. The question is: As a parent, what is our role in this? We can’t always control how or what other people see or say about them. But we can certainly educate our children as to what they can say or see in our homes, all through open communication…
Interesting doc from National Film Board (Sexy Inc. Our Children Under Influence 0:35:26min), talking about over sexploitation of kids for the sake of consumerism. Tween market is a transition from kid to adult, introducing lip-gloss that the young girls have no need for by adding enticing flavors that appeal to them (cherry, vanilla…)

Would an adult wear this? Iif not, what makes it ok for a kid to wear it?
“Shopping gives meaning to our life? We have replaced religion, and spirituality with the shopping God” Young girls of 5/6 years old see sexy as an image, not sex. One point in the doc, one of group of girls from a workshop realized that most of the images she sees in teen magazines are not much different from that of a porno magazine. Se then gets very upset about how she sees these things as so normalized.
Sexy Inc. Our Children Under Influence
“Sophie Bissonnette’s documentary analyzes the hypersexualization of our environment and its noxious effects on young people. Psychologists, teachers and school nurses criticize the unhealthy culture surrounding our children, where marketing and advertising are targeting younger and younger audiences and bombarding them with sexual and sexist images. Sexy Inc. suggests various ways of countering hypersexualization and the eroticization of childhood and invites us to rally against this worrying phenomenon.”
Thank Mary for the tip
you may find these interesting:
New Trend: men & skin care (sexualization of men)
Over-sexed and over here: The ‘tarty’ Bratz Doll / Daily Mail UK
Chanel #5 wanted to change their image from being a mother’s or grandma’s perfume. They reached back to a hit song from a decade before, from a commercial that played at the 1979 super-bowl.
1941 Inkspots hit ”I don’t want to set the World on Fire” directed by Ridley Scott.
Tapping into your feelings of yearning and sensuality makes the commercial linger in your memory long after seeing it. And Chanel has kept this fomula over the years and invested $100s of millions of dollars towards each of their commercials.
The new ipad is out and many fanboy hipsters and tech gear junkies are lovingly fondling the sexy new toy…or dreaming of doing so.
There is a new unease about Apple products. A lot of critics have said Apple is losing its way and become too corporate. All of their new products do not allow Flash on their mobile devices. Adobe has been part of design industry for so long that almost every one of us has used or has come into contact with Adobe everyday. But according to the Steve Jobs letter to Adobe “While Adobe’s Flash products are widely available, this does not mean they are open, since they are controlled entirely by Adobe and available only from Adobe. By almost any definition, Flash is a closed system.”
What I’m uneasy with is this: as consumers, we have to download and maybe buy something only available from Apple instead of using the free products we already have and therefor creating an anti-competitve market. In the long run, we as consumers will loose and have to pay out what ever Apple said the product costs.
Apple as a brand, has become a cliche for people who have money. But long before that brand was established, creative and free minded individuals helped maintain Apple through its near death experience. Has Apple forgotten their loyal customer base? Like gentrifying a neighborhood: creative and artistic individuals move in to a poor neighborhood and make it into a community that is hip and vibrant. The yuppies move in, and the rent goes out of control, forcing the very people who made that community move out. Doesn’t the neighborhood loose the essence of what made it great?
It seems like Apple is moving to into corporate world and becoming self enclosed. Cory Doctorow in an interview on Search Engine makes a good point on how Apple became worse than Microsoft #39: Apple Rots (listen to the interview here)
Cory also worte for Boing Boing comparing Apple to” Wal-Martization of the software channel” / Why I won’t buy an iPad (and think you shouldn’t, either) and created a big uproar among Apple lover.
These are exciting time in technology. I can’t help but wonder when Apple product will become just like any other product?
I have recently give into getting an Iphone, paying 30$ extra a month for the data plan. It is something that i don’t need, and can get for free with my laptop. Why? Simply put, I just wanted a new toy. But if Apple continues to go the direction that its going, self-enclosed and self-censorship, thinking they are the moral rating body and doing all the pre-thinking for me as the article from gawker.com point out: “Apple believes it has a “moral responsibility” to patrol content on the iPhone. That apparently includes heavily watering down a guide to New York’s gay culture, as one author just learned.” via Apple Rejects Gay-Sightseeing App Over Gay Sights
I will not hesitate to drop them like a hot potato, and may choice to lose a few hundred buck over losing my freedom of thought. Some of the comment below giving any indication to Apple. Apple, you are walking on a fine line of ignoring and being offensive to your customer’s intelligence, and yes, you are in great danger of damaging your brand, and losing your core customer base–the hip and the scene maker who thinks outside of the box and makes life a bit more colorful.
“Every other electronic device in the world will allow me to look at naked people. What, exactly is your marketing position that makes you think that by saying “no” you will win?”
“How can they reject an application that merely suggest places of interest, but approve an app like, Grinder, that is basically used for hooking up?!”
“I’ve just lost a lot of respect for Apple. Assholes! And hypocrites, since apparently soft porn like the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is, according to them, just fine.”
The WHY Wally-Hermès Yachts , designed and developed by the Why team, are part of the Hermès luxury brand. The 900 square meters of solar panels produce 500KWh of electricity per day. Features include the 25M temperature-controlled swimming pool at the front, a crew of 20, space for you and 12 of your friends and a maximum speed of 14 Knots. All this for the cost of something in the range of $90M pounds.
‘everybody’s dream is to live on an island, in complete freedom, without constraint, with the independence that only self-sufficiency can provide. a piece of land with a beautiful villa partly fulfils this aspiration because it is static. a yacht offers the freedom to move, but does not have the space of a property. WHY has it all: space, stability, movement, independence, peace. WHY goes even further. this revolutionary concept of the moving island is developed with the latest and most advanced sustainable technologies, recycling thermal energy, as well as any organic and inorganic waste. the architecture of the whole project fits perfectly in the environment – there are no excesses, nothing is superfluous, the impact on the sea is minimum. a new and unique way to live on the sea while caring about it, protecting it, and loving it. all this has always been my dream too, and when I met pierre-alexis dumas I realised that this dream could come true thanks to the common values and ethical principles we share.’ luca bassani antivari, president and CEO of Wally / via designboom
thanks Christina for the tip and pictures
Thank you Christina for the tip
Found this ad in downtown Toronto shopping center.

Share the love/ in store AX Ad
Armani Exchange’s spring 2010 campaign.
Photography: Matthew Scrivens
Model: Marlon Teixeira, Clint Mauro, Tomas Skoloudik, Irina Shak, and Tamiris Souza Freitas
via the fashionisto
Brand (ie: Miss Sixty and Rock & Republic) are hiring celebrities to sit on their fashion show front rows.
Rihanna and Dsquare designer
A-List
Rihanna ($100,000 or more)
Beyonce ($80,000-$100,000)
Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen ($80,000 each)
Julianne Moore ($60,000)
Maggie Gyllanhal ($60,000)
Chloe Sevigny ($60,000 or more)
Jennifer Lopez (circa 2005: $80,000; circa 2010: $30,000)
Lindsay Lohan (circa 2006: $60,000; circa 2010; UNINVITED)
Colin Firth (pre-A Single Man: $5,000; post-A Single Man: $15,000)Colin Firth
B-List
Blake Lively ($50,000)
Leighton Meester ($40,000)
Hillary Duff ($40,000)
Other Gossip Girl cast members ($25,000 a piece)
Jared Leto ($25,000)
Cliven Owen ($10,000)
Kristen Bell (unpaid, but airfare, makeup and clothing are taken care of)C-List
Kim Kardashian ($35,000-$50,000)
Amanda Bynes ($25,000-$30,000)
Eliza Dushku (unpaid, but airfare, makeup and clothing are taken care of)D-List
Paris Hilton (free or UNINVITED)
Jersey Shore cast (UNINVITED)
America’s Next Top Model Winners (free)tip via fashionista
Colin Firth & Julianne Moore in A Single Man movie
Burberry’s 2010 spring/summer new face no other than Emma Watson, the smarty pant know it all form Harry Potter.
It look like a great add, keep and old brand fresh and fashionably relevant.
Use the form below to search the site:
Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!
A few highly recommended friends...
All entries, chronologically...